{"id":"W2551557769","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14656083.v1","title":"Valuing protected areas through contingent valuation : a case study of Chitwan National Park, Nepal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"European Environment Agency; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; World Wildlife Fund","keywords":"National park; Contingent valuation; World heritage; Willingness to pay; Tourism; Valuation (finance); Protected area; Geography; Socioeconomics; Value (mathematics); Business; Environmental resource management; Economic growth; Economics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001309917,0.0003169227,0.0002785547,0.001064983,0.003703505,0.002527273,0.001161226,0.001492958,0.002701748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00396333,0.000264163,0.0003192307,0.001769718,0.001654264,0.001803283,0.001761999,0.001251991,0.0001521872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002806217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001134633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03862212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08463112,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990878,0.0005911621,0.00002147314,0.00005581001,0.00009225644,0.0001514775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967812,0.002398566,0.0002244011,0.0001442544,0.0001767759,0.0002747808],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009967691,0.00508035,0.4322503,0.0006920096,0.0003084053,0.1715093,0.1884681,0.02628741,0.004682697,0.0638526,0.005870271,0.1000019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001292527,0.001351095,0.275416,0.0007002766,0.0001706136,0.02268852,0.5826556,0.07462785,0.002848398,0.0115615,0.02765214,0.0001987021],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944012,0.0000856928,0.0004483301,0.0002476373,0.000002001593,0.0000523481,0.00004382482,0.000001897984,0.004716972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977345,0.0001850396,0.0009019527,0.00002822854,0.000002349662,0.00003392258,0.00003021481,0.000002309281,0.001081401],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03862212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07679462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2445663964207909,"score_gpt":0.2779697626799596,"score_spread":0.03340336625916868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}