{"id":"W2551629667","doi":"10.1016/j.dib.2016.11.012","title":"Measuring resilience to financial instability: A new dataset","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data in Brief","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Globe; Financial crisis; Benchmark (surveying); Resilience (materials science); Financial stability; Psychological resilience; Jurisdiction; Economics; Set (abstract data type); Business; Finance; Financial system; Political science; Macroeconomics; Computer science; Geography; Psychology; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009588992,0.0007674225,0.0006686326,0.004438845,0.001023314,0.001779221,0.001719414,0.002203008,0.009299354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00592135,0.0002706638,0.0008607341,0.005100382,0.0004794645,0.001441659,0.002603953,0.001645316,0.01079265],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00132265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00132709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02269771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04117836,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988672,0.00017732,0.0001540541,0.0003125351,0.0002960284,0.0001929587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968414,0.000645712,0.0006483858,0.0006069276,0.0007896663,0.000467903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000552964,0.0004860966,0.1540268,0.0008042668,0.0002242523,0.0006019023,0.0006659951,0.002795923,0.00105052,0.003114761,0.7992533,0.03642322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002027167,0.0001700921,0.3624294,0.0004482225,0.00009801271,0.0006532595,0.002142288,0.003628602,0.001121801,0.002934233,0.6260336,0.0001378507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","genre_scores_codex":[0.03718643,0.0004150922,0.0006742909,0.001064991,0.00009752632,0.0001021083,0.9557946,0.0002835025,0.004381531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0304487,0.0002338953,0.002059182,0.0002198004,0.00007580576,0.0003267399,0.9645148,0.00005453672,0.002066591],"genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02269771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04513121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0997810730257019,"score_gpt":0.2698645002687209,"score_spread":0.1700834272430191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}