{"id":"W2551708897","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.014","title":"Assessing the safety effects of cooperative intelligent transport systems: A bowtie analysis approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Statens vegvesen","keywords":"Intelligent transportation system; Accident analysis; Risk analysis (engineering); Fuzzy logic; Transport engineering; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy set; Accident (philosophy); Engineering; System safety; Poison control; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Artificial intelligence; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00429197,0.00141553,0.00190874,0.004031509,0.001231534,0.002934097,0.002031268,0.002194125,0.004051382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01117893,0.0008695774,0.003018067,0.001395746,0.001727187,0.004188761,0.003658868,0.002107383,0.000278923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001746055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002012774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01403348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006266513,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975287,0.000856769,0.00007121689,0.0003097432,0.0009127288,0.0003209224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964478,0.002465659,0.0003066925,0.0002324549,0.0004332001,0.0001141638],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001551103,0.0001648957,0.004112956,0.00006111972,0.0004080907,0.0001211646,0.0001594411,0.9347944,0.002532078,0.02743628,0.0003442849,0.02971022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001912063,0.0003099962,0.001657518,0.000008032703,0.0001352073,0.0000252399,0.00009504532,0.9836119,0.0008034734,0.01298395,0.0003329658,0.00001757652],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3079382,0.0003448965,0.6725089,0.0004365598,0.00007985729,0.0002428657,0.0001068405,0.0002166936,0.01812523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9446267,0.000252223,0.04980351,0.00007078529,0.00006360542,0.0001624317,0.00007553631,0.00005302869,0.004892162],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01403348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02790362,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05405409191686707,"score_gpt":0.3835154075502686,"score_spread":0.3294613156334016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}