{"id":"W2551708897","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.014","title":"Assessing the safety effects of cooperative intelligent transport systems: A bowtie analysis approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accident Analysis & Prevention","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Statens vegvesen","keywords":"Intelligent transportation system; Accident analysis; Risk analysis (engineering); Fuzzy logic; Transport engineering; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy set; Accident (philosophy); Engineering; System safety; Poison control; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Artificial intelligence; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008135916,0.000330037,0.001545486,0.002060189,0.0004181309,0.0003642472,0.001266513,0.0001514754,0.0005401059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009059301,0.0001589414,0.003121841,0.01366694,0.0001850072,0.001208457,0.0001190487,0.0001543042,0.00006139257],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001518274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009713593,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004586356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001762675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915846,0.002271944,0.002374087,0.0009665836,0.002434561,0.0003682199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933774,0.002470668,0.001516533,0.001559347,0.0009380442,0.0001380164],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006722044,0.000329542,0.8537493,0.000006873475,0.02474784,0.000006217826,0.001073018,0.0687701,0.0005531005,0.001262816,0.0001130633,0.04932096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005848958,0.0000908292,0.8849697,0.00008954333,0.0546202,0.000001980842,0.004351518,0.04988082,0.00187046,0.002712474,0.0003873215,0.0004402463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.282326,0.0008968661,0.7153222,0.0003243288,0.00009448923,0.0003610858,0.000001714898,0.00002464423,0.0006487062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949808,0.0007946689,0.0004911475,0.00002023195,0.00006061715,0.00006069335,0.00006135927,0.00001261427,0.003517836],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7148311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.656651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05405409191686707,"score_gpt":0.3835154075502686,"score_spread":0.3294613156334016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}