{"id":"W2551877356","doi":"10.36939/cjur/vol25no1/art26","title":"National Style in the Architecture of Parliament: Whose Nation, Whose Style?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of urban research","topic":"Historical Architecture and Urbanism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Style (visual arts); Identity (music); National identity; Architecture; Argument (complex analysis); Nationalism; Centennial; History; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Art; Aesthetics; Politics; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002482197,0.0001033063,0.0001915211,0.0009563834,0.0003127889,0.0001018977,0.0006257076,0.00005137081,0.001484295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007169628,0.00005520992,0.000103644,0.0002124946,0.0005847053,0.0001414906,0.00001639116,0.0005573647,0.00003528424],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003569703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001513944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004924287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1083281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975798,0.0004716614,0.0004192199,0.0001260623,0.0009910344,0.0004122039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977124,0.0007674175,0.0001288024,0.0001669028,0.0009387872,0.0002856464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001282568,0.000152361,0.003006693,0.00006571483,0.00009040722,0.0002205481,0.1324097,0.00002140538,0.0005097459,0.3959352,0.4508688,0.01659123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000533902,0.0002847383,0.002143682,0.0001548431,0.00000533869,0.00002365005,0.001483854,0.000002666036,0.00006220538,0.02347056,0.971742,0.00009256337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5946468,0.008220528,0.0003316495,0.0800088,0.001838303,0.001257449,0.0005995642,0.00001891345,0.313078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929602,0.00001582974,0.00003501708,0.000227354,0.0008959244,0.000006854847,0.000002089159,0.00001335279,0.005843347],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5208732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07555671417435438,"score_gpt":0.2794505908869288,"score_spread":0.2038938767125744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}