{"id":"W2552436863","doi":"10.5539/hes.v6n4p131","title":"Metonymic-Based Metaphor—A Case Study on the Cognitive Interpretation of “Heart” in English and Chinese","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education Studies","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metonymy; Metaphor; Categorization; Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics; Metaphor and metonymy; Conceptual metaphor; Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive linguistics; Philosophy; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004300081,0.000144999,0.0002439822,0.0001841162,0.00006833917,0.00001147445,0.00004996103,0.00003726177,0.0003273727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001767595,0.00007415657,0.00004506327,0.0002701039,0.0001299984,0.00007623246,0.00001613755,0.00007782458,0.00002487021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002907331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003088658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001811912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001253514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987531,0.0004702242,0.0002653298,0.0002645057,0.0001284414,0.0001184119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997878,0.001380027,0.0001272354,0.0001901031,0.0003991543,0.00002554303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001375562,0.008994332,0.3881243,0.0001205858,0.002419612,0.0001435616,0.5312155,0.000001439145,0.001051156,0.006836354,0.005393154,0.05432446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002222921,0.0005398149,0.5085734,0.0001884622,0.0002915701,0.00002074136,0.4859947,0.000001620367,0.0005999034,0.001013816,0.0003305351,0.000222493],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937493,0.002269048,0.00003845258,0.0006300686,0.001229075,0.0005142065,0.00001278879,0.00002490338,0.001532213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976894,0.00001429274,0.00001871689,0.0006090669,0.0001020527,0.0005201548,0.000002391669,0.00001247989,0.001031463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1204491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3584501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04157874073573303,"score_gpt":0.3857937053696804,"score_spread":0.3442149646339474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}