{"id":"W2552436863","doi":"10.5539/hes.v6n4p131","title":"Metonymic-Based Metaphor—A Case Study on the Cognitive Interpretation of “Heart” in English and Chinese","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education Studies","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metonymy; Metaphor; Categorization; Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics; Metaphor and metonymy; Conceptual metaphor; Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive linguistics; Philosophy; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002750536,0.000827738,0.0005947009,0.001538765,0.008957287,0.002651,0.001473549,0.002336535,0.002432273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004720927,0.0004082587,0.0006011603,0.001935126,0.008611741,0.004243327,0.003653854,0.002787912,0.0002248827],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004623903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002348001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02369662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03879717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975114,0.001570428,0.00009299033,0.0001599601,0.0003266499,0.0003386168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980747,0.001373032,0.0001591946,0.0001115768,0.0001322743,0.0001492584],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004193521,0.00005656815,0.002902916,0.0001223452,0.000006503677,0.01751371,0.9561098,0.0000532045,0.001803943,0.01563218,0.0008112168,0.004945711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001628548,0.00006357886,0.006919507,0.0001477483,0.00002170237,0.01297483,0.9500366,0.0007425817,0.001826135,0.003032034,0.02416771,0.00005117516],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9830608,0.0007131087,0.001683444,0.001476415,0.00004547315,0.00006863177,0.00003564792,0.00001082099,0.01290568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955669,0.0004131487,0.001429701,0.0002098415,0.00001346989,0.00003459254,0.00002254694,0.00001511657,0.002294705],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02369662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04711741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04157874073573303,"score_gpt":0.3857937053696804,"score_spread":0.3442149646339474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}