{"id":"W2553254625","doi":"10.56645/jmde.v12i27.454","title":"Debate on the Appropriate Methods for Conducting Impact Evaluation of Programs within the Development Context","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impact evaluation; Context (archaeology); Program evaluation; Computer science; Management science; Intervention (counseling); Impact assessment; Process management; Evaluation methods; Risk analysis (engineering); Psychology; Political science; Business; Engineering; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5207908,0.001683056,0.003890586,0.0101495,0.004265987,0.02078943,0.01040803,0.008739012,0.006389208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5896611,0.001571536,0.003876295,0.0129001,0.01975723,0.02490123,0.008858263,0.01457673,0.002327821],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01344455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03601678,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007154427,"domain_scores_codex":[0.519501,0.3697241,0.04105641,0.009683604,0.0558103,0.004224534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2125923,0.6289802,0.02840879,0.02826151,0.09809104,0.003666158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006470837,0.0006368547,0.01247362,0.02818611,0.0007620769,0.0002018865,0.02280259,0.002748099,0.001053664,0.3373347,0.03987989,0.5532735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006574194,0.001003015,0.01748874,0.1494006,0.001119251,0.0006957719,0.04998466,0.005487356,0.004733379,0.4158615,0.3528684,0.000700051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02761912,0.1585663,0.347848,0.367868,0.008716635,0.006781985,0.002041173,0.0006079742,0.07995095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2867523,0.07308248,0.5763091,0.0401837,0.002711366,0.01605287,0.00063304,0.0006197004,0.003655506],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4792092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5909503,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6229679264758866,"score_gpt":0.6137793347535752,"score_spread":0.009188591722311457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}