{"id":"W2553254625","doi":"10.56645/jmde.v12i27.454","title":"Debate on the Appropriate Methods for Conducting Impact Evaluation of Programs within the Development Context","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impact evaluation; Context (archaeology); Program evaluation; Computer science; Management science; Intervention (counseling); Impact assessment; Process management; Evaluation methods; Risk analysis (engineering); Psychology; Political science; Business; Engineering; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1990921,0.0001963609,0.0003690485,0.0002604434,0.0004943751,0.0001265749,0.0007112193,0.00007742583,0.0004060477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01551316,0.0000673592,0.0002935991,0.0004838099,0.0001433777,0.0006335622,0.00008984889,0.0001834682,0.00002290901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000498205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002289622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002580683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003263156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867742,0.00504862,0.002274995,0.0002908922,0.005380057,0.0002312406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812877,0.006353096,0.003743076,0.0005129456,0.008023367,0.00007985104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003899821,0.0001541862,0.002679575,0.000004838014,0.0001245403,7.330209e-8,0.008254159,0.01041958,0.01144586,0.0003549402,0.0001315567,0.9660407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006761027,0.001955881,0.07345316,0.0004863645,0.0005341875,0.00003306768,0.02276497,0.7646508,0.05936598,0.06918363,0.0005078907,0.0003030727],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9423179,0.0001775909,0.04826767,0.005905836,0.0009008266,0.002194718,0.000003083992,0.000005618062,0.000226741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981334,0.000006091768,0.01814369,0.00004163829,0.0001611066,0.0001958684,0.000003687833,0.00001380872,0.0001000537],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9657376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6229679264758866,"score_gpt":0.6137793347535752,"score_spread":0.009188591722311457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}