{"id":"W2553344954","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.11.027","title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of in situ versus composite bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","topic":"Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques","field":"Medicine","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Internal thoracic artery; Confidence interval; Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trial; Revascularization; Anastomosis; Perioperative; Internal medicine; Myocardial infarction; Surgery; Observational study; Cardiology; Relative risk; Artery; Bypass grafting","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_broad"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009493858,0.0006235429,0.02421285,0.002016329,0.00003655545,0.00004444396,0.0001624201,0.0002818869,0.00003249851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003406105,0.0003581534,0.02545954,0.001020469,0.0001172599,0.0002308645,0.0001287207,0.0005875636,0.000001700948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009964652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001964207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000115193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001321848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9929341,0.002175808,0.003251661,0.0004407195,0.0008807928,0.0003169299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950759,0.001532434,0.002027317,0.0008089707,0.000323228,0.0002321597],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001086909,0.00003370126,0.00007700784,0.400031,0.4306282,0.0009394248,0.00001712842,2.430027e-7,8.12659e-7,6.893031e-7,0.00004833332,0.1681148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008065432,0.00004937058,0.00009052997,0.1731295,0.816211,0.003699736,0.00001293529,5.875574e-7,0.000004086224,0.000003841303,0.006434559,0.0002830929],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004487955,0.9981183,0.0002533323,0.00004567913,0.0001715833,0.0008155706,0.00003815178,0.00001648903,0.00009203834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004907107,0.9946337,0.0001122283,0.00006660576,0.00008807318,0.00005891538,0.00001764949,0.00005147019,0.00006429712],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3855828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999887,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06193620135232853,"score_gpt":0.3577032817266806,"score_spread":0.2957670803743521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}