{"id":"W2553866482","doi":"10.82308/33833","title":"The use of social science evidence in constitutional adjudication: overcoming the challenges of the adversarial system","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Adversarial system; Adjudication; Political science; Sociology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2222413,0.0005623391,0.001312436,0.008349961,0.01706585,0.02556872,0.004224986,0.007247296,0.001579216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2676659,0.001083141,0.0006502842,0.004013309,0.1088159,0.01830689,0.01715484,0.01094933,0.0002992025],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01589856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04063321,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05899598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0938933,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7732823,0.1769864,0.004692988,0.005322799,0.03427908,0.005436518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.495473,0.4604978,0.01039369,0.01380343,0.01783831,0.001993749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001583652,0.00002055991,0.001699433,0.0001435218,0.00002929458,0.0001916862,0.02030717,0.0007352905,0.0002075955,0.9445934,0.002141543,0.02991466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005703387,0.000109754,0.003731046,0.001975889,0.0000633684,0.0002444061,0.01840519,0.003954402,0.001414246,0.8551307,0.1147644,0.0001495318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1064295,0.02081663,0.2317251,0.3269254,0.001528762,0.000465632,0.00008180365,0.0001298105,0.3118974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9538866,0.004583004,0.02834887,0.00938166,0.000622561,0.0001678215,0.00001347263,0.00004387842,0.002952135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2222413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.959115,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08602033592604312,"score_gpt":0.2821905082258253,"score_spread":0.1961701722997822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}