{"id":"W2554322188","doi":"","title":"Posturing, Tinkering and Reforming the Law of Negligence - a Canadian Perspective?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Jurisdiction; Law; Tort reform; Project commissioning; Political science; Law reform; Liability; Common law; Perspective (graphical); Publishing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002710939,0.00005276706,0.00009558004,0.00004062877,0.001488176,0.00003115524,0.0002820303,0.00003990134,0.0001680605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000333698,0.00004670089,0.00005499899,0.00008377095,0.0006037164,0.0002547253,0.00004085838,0.0001520915,0.000003773949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001414189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009838198,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8158777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8630573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993851,0.00006089748,0.00008073916,0.00008208675,0.0001946401,0.0001965658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999438,0.00003699972,0.0001075298,0.00007504835,0.0001075471,0.0002348043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001965752,0.00001268522,0.002636795,0.00001235726,0.00003674522,0.00007515142,0.5215649,0.00002424458,0.00009935426,0.4722424,0.0004038877,0.002871819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002911759,0.00008513137,0.002687232,0.0002257321,0.00007795775,0.00007697957,0.7961494,0.00003982126,0.00006666897,0.003284338,0.1968451,0.0001704884],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7355143,0.001744152,0.0000756255,0.01059225,0.0001252598,0.000104388,0.000008819825,0.00001374584,0.2518214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982607,0.0003006648,0.0002552815,0.00005045916,0.00007746604,6.329237e-9,4.731807e-8,0.000002431391,0.001052995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4689581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04385904964817727,"score_gpt":0.2452122505781492,"score_spread":0.2013532009299719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}