{"id":"W2554825323","doi":"10.1007/s10806-016-9647-2","title":"Labels for Animal Husbandry Systems Meet Consumer Preferences: Results from a Meta-analysis of Consumer Studies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics","topic":"Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Rural Affairs","keywords":"Animal husbandry; Animal welfare; Business; Welfare; Labelling; Allowance (engineering); Marketing; Preference; Product (mathematics); Consumer behaviour; Public economics; Agricultural science; Economics; Geography; Biology; Agriculture; Operations management; Microeconomics; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005693767,0.0002447898,0.001234479,0.00006751966,0.0001879684,0.00002124977,0.0001322336,0.0001675454,0.0000395289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001772707,0.00009977034,0.0006856641,0.0000859779,0.000421832,0.0002262039,0.0001057489,0.000218749,0.000002691631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005052646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009538581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007041319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003584267,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980841,0.0001873412,0.0008794287,0.0002404637,0.000428696,0.000179969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974865,0.001406433,0.000770595,0.0001096706,0.0001388671,0.00008789751],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006449175,0.0006840437,0.03248389,0.0002702896,0.4805527,0.00007284339,0.01769186,0.00004679539,0.454815,0.0005330182,0.00585136,0.0005489535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002745346,0.002939911,0.7391937,0.0001611284,0.2208172,0.0001417341,0.02909345,0.000003253499,0.00189191,0.0001256124,0.002352092,0.0005346354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9697688,0.0254671,0.00001292606,0.001238683,0.000115137,0.0001710213,0.003172922,0.000006355844,0.00004706398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924979,0.007063934,0.0001622229,0.00004220026,0.00005910514,0.0000138196,0.00003114053,0.000006956096,0.000122702],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7067099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4068516,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2929209776317693,"score_gpt":0.3687094507618947,"score_spread":0.07578847313012543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}