{"id":"W2555170733","doi":"10.3303/cet1331020","title":"Dust Explosion Quantitative Risk Management for Nontraditional Dusts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Combustion and Detonation Processes","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Flammable liquid; Dust explosion; Fault tree analysis; Computational fluid dynamics; Residual; Environmental science; Risk management; Flammability limit; Process engineering; Forensic engineering; Nuclear engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Engineering; Waste management; Reliability engineering; Aerospace engineering; Ignition system; Algorithm; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00002429079,0.00009440172,0.0001085199,0.0001033298,0.0001514786,0.00006617883,0.0001319159,0.00004285714,0.00007809047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001230293,0.0001205811,0.00008407249,0.0001186807,0.00004926187,0.0009498083,0.0000318549,0.00005741026,0.00008060627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005816831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008560298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009371019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003686794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994586,0.000006784335,0.0001102653,0.0001457314,0.0001658381,0.0001127956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995234,0.00007825451,0.00006766928,0.000109302,0.0001526617,0.00006872869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000843155,0.001974495,0.02255083,0.003500093,0.002759925,0.0002562958,0.006994231,0.08593264,0.009607594,0.1425823,0.5365728,0.1864257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008547376,0.00111162,0.3897045,0.00068494,0.000504408,0.00009042121,0.03380953,0.338858,0.008979937,0.02723834,0.1877417,0.002729211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7872928,0.0001553499,0.1087473,0.00008418167,0.0004919536,0.0005982072,0.0002026086,0.0003616473,0.102066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925693,0.0000454269,0.003804892,0.000007822504,0.00002357959,0.000003349321,0.00005166747,0.00001240108,0.003481512],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3671537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4917154,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01078820568477506,"score_gpt":0.1753473639485375,"score_spread":0.1645591582637624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}