{"id":"W2555170733","doi":"10.3303/cet1331020","title":"Dust Explosion Quantitative Risk Management for Nontraditional Dusts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"Combustion and Detonation Processes","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Flammable liquid; Dust explosion; Fault tree analysis; Computational fluid dynamics; Residual; Environmental science; Risk management; Flammability limit; Process engineering; Forensic engineering; Nuclear engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Engineering; Waste management; Reliability engineering; Aerospace engineering; Ignition system; Algorithm; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002643292,0.0009491398,0.0006653148,0.001465781,0.0004532942,0.001639675,0.00151881,0.0005901525,0.001125378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005532608,0.0002685245,0.0006884449,0.000444371,0.001018238,0.001590412,0.001874682,0.0008404924,0.0001043033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001199831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001455901,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001793333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001809084,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977401,0.0005273415,0.0001261302,0.0002713432,0.001223935,0.0001112166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964272,0.001789182,0.0007041335,0.0003886071,0.0006063793,0.00008446266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001119222,0.0001373219,0.003693756,0.00009102529,0.00005242399,0.0001081827,0.0001654851,0.889369,0.01254687,0.03225178,0.0002588301,0.06121347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001427651,0.0001068715,0.0009686875,0.00001220301,0.00001830664,0.00004708753,0.00006605547,0.9708731,0.008897725,0.0181092,0.000868675,0.0000177935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04257014,0.0000796557,0.9552398,0.00009956041,0.00001067817,0.00008556851,0.00004649644,0.0003010065,0.001567159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7785558,0.0001433427,0.2192695,0.00003250855,0.00002774837,0.000152274,0.0001180122,0.000054611,0.001646147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002643292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0139792,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01078820568477506,"score_gpt":0.1753473639485375,"score_spread":0.1645591582637624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}