{"id":"W2555595165","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.12710","title":"Evidence for a stochastic geometry of biodiversity: the effects of species abundance, richness and intraspecific clustering","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Intraspecific competition; Species richness; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Interspecific competition; Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Biological dispersal; Biology; Relative species abundance; Coexistence theory; Macroecology; Relative abundance distribution; Community; Ecosystem; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003546284,0.00005049814,0.000192015,0.00005883612,0.00008276736,0.000002231018,0.0001410883,0.00004039039,0.00006656729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007790096,0.00002823556,0.00004280922,0.00008179792,0.0005580959,0.0001100745,0.0001193038,0.00004942479,0.00000287038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004810571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009587105,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001826597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001234316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995056,0.00004353788,0.0002133346,0.00006879643,0.00006841712,0.0001003135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967235,0.002798963,0.0003633869,0.00005608853,0.00003764025,0.00002045669],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000275172,0.00009394967,0.960511,0.0001529402,0.0001442399,0.000007379082,0.0010934,0.0007849863,0.03297167,0.0005154336,0.0007142578,0.002735525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005424519,0.0005756966,0.9968503,0.00007294032,0.00005456545,0.00002467685,0.0001893647,0.00009618139,0.0004637117,0.00105535,0.00003655042,0.0000382702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857559,0.0002784827,0.0125766,0.0008910049,0.000345918,0.0001163367,0.000002584359,0.000001126063,0.00003211006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991028,0.0003877514,0.000376186,0.00003686568,0.00002000556,0.000002355261,3.432507e-8,0.000001496246,0.00007256031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03633919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2056327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02179894420970189,"score_gpt":0.2420656295142303,"score_spread":0.2202666853045284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}