{"id":"W2555595165","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.12710","title":"Evidence for a stochastic geometry of biodiversity: the effects of species abundance, richness and intraspecific clustering","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Intraspecific competition; Species richness; Ecology; Context (archaeology); Interspecific competition; Abundance (ecology); Biodiversity; Biological dispersal; Biology; Relative species abundance; Coexistence theory; Macroecology; Relative abundance distribution; Community; Ecosystem; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002308234,0.0003454753,0.0005059207,0.001019209,0.0004848942,0.001278415,0.000897006,0.0006272816,0.003663789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01863967,0.0003344568,0.0008438894,0.000770364,0.002651091,0.001011084,0.001667497,0.0007865304,0.0002788351],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005418187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004385156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003640593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00289677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979542,0.0009341715,0.00009859588,0.0005667609,0.0003045898,0.0001415743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9466555,0.03256419,0.01110061,0.004853452,0.001401018,0.003425202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003480231,0.0000794183,0.969126,0.00006667854,0.0006604689,0.0003447804,0.0003408633,0.01175175,0.004839748,0.005787218,0.0003310862,0.006324118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001483621,0.0001012797,0.9634429,0.00001186318,0.0001200366,0.0003932768,0.0003611407,0.02331565,0.0004562573,0.01148974,0.0002592382,0.00003385636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946576,0.0001482666,0.003213215,0.0002402854,0.000006718161,0.000007001543,0.0001281247,0.0000329276,0.001565782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995783,0.00001585589,0.0003164691,0.00001204034,0.00000467805,0.000001687888,0.00003288647,0.000003511391,0.00003453824],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003663789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01225656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02179894420970189,"score_gpt":0.2420656295142303,"score_spread":0.2202666853045284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}