{"id":"W2555676011","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2016.11.009","title":"A sensitivity and specificity comparison of fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in evaluation of suspicious breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Breast","topic":"Breast Lesions and Carcinomas","field":"Medicine","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton Health Sciences; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton; Population Health Research Institute; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Meta-analysis; Biopsy; Fine needle aspiration cytology; Radiology; Subgroup analysis; Cytology; Breast cancer; Diagnostic accuracy; Core biopsy; Pathology; Cancer; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003758501,0.0003957555,0.007115428,0.0004246129,0.0000619292,0.00001161878,0.00008468844,0.0002164078,0.00007042524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001868033,0.0001993836,0.0005915411,0.0007947127,0.000293676,0.00005328809,0.0001164026,0.0002372375,0.000002555896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006768719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001549368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000293496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002444083,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959558,0.001572,0.001406175,0.0004227092,0.0004560788,0.0001872944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969743,0.0005518463,0.001243444,0.0007179476,0.0004284664,0.00008402721],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000972316,0.000460703,0.001142396,0.7785678,0.02954468,0.00001707377,0.0003447927,0.000001880264,0.00004438477,0.000302486,0.00003251151,0.189444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006604627,0.0001362003,0.01371592,0.05637903,0.9197313,0.00816595,0.0002561639,0.0005822129,0.00000130383,0.00003676907,0.00006652512,0.0002681784],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003146071,0.9928101,0.00006201741,0.0004819949,0.00001122727,0.003020828,0.0004154581,0.00001086728,0.00004143752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3104507,0.6891443,0.00004647782,0.00002660222,0.00002097092,0.0001525203,0.00009593596,0.00002517031,0.00003725857],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8901866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8130628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2049381745224407,"score_gpt":0.3975435000529621,"score_spread":0.1926053255305214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}