{"id":"W2556186545","doi":"10.1002/ieam.1865","title":"A weight-of-evidence approach for deriving a level of concern for atrazine that is protective of aquatic plant communities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Intrinsik (Canada)","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Atrazine; Mesocosm; Environmental science; Aquatic ecosystem; Water quality; Aquatic plant; Aquatic toxicology; Environmental monitoring; Environmental protection; Toxicology; Pesticide; Environmental engineering; Ecology; Ecosystem; Biology; Macrophyte; Toxicity; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2096456,0.004012505,0.01143872,0.03776749,0.002374059,0.007437815,0.007534044,0.007481144,0.009155454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4528853,0.001888421,0.01696952,0.0117595,0.004146805,0.005199469,0.005360939,0.006285796,0.001254871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006028952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009626634,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004410122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7333347,0.1687871,0.04201639,0.01021782,0.04439335,0.001250705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5206847,0.401917,0.02263431,0.01051899,0.04086863,0.003376428],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01202968,0.001162183,0.0535892,0.2027792,0.1887431,0.001945394,0.001548723,0.01815508,0.003578361,0.02965659,0.01777153,0.469041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01419572,0.0182053,0.04822251,0.1780339,0.3198212,0.003737975,0.00318359,0.09345315,0.005614954,0.1714869,0.1430551,0.0009897257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.04450774,0.3341076,0.4355484,0.03304866,0.01136357,0.06980668,0.01313975,0.001334338,0.05714329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4045776,0.03488596,0.5074298,0.00692627,0.002157917,0.03808248,0.003014279,0.0001381741,0.002787561],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2096456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9746478,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1883908789416926,"score_gpt":0.311167654647193,"score_spread":0.1227767757055004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}