{"id":"W2556286172","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2008-0021","title":"THEORETICAL INVESTIGATION INTO THE PERFORMANCE OF THE ROTARY-SCREW FLUID DISPENSING PROCESS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies","field":"Chemical Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Process (computing); Flow (mathematics); Mechanical engineering; Compressibility; Newtonian fluid; Fluid dynamics; Non-Newtonian fluid; Mechanics; Materials science; Computer science; Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006446153,0.0005508951,0.0008160026,0.0003716413,0.000572391,0.0009583005,0.001105522,0.001172876,0.002634271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003420385,0.0002612994,0.0004846872,0.0003198262,0.0008343693,0.001164045,0.0005305184,0.0005191113,0.0005213818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008599071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007524391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002993104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006904622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996734,0.00004944307,0.00001033444,0.00004310108,0.000175738,0.00004797298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990669,0.0006631711,0.0000569465,0.00004517375,0.0001455159,0.00002233722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001287569,0.00008310208,0.0005648118,0.0002338401,0.00001500812,0.0002374686,0.000138614,0.9187981,0.0218886,0.04647201,0.0003354302,0.01110424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004898247,0.00003208263,0.00009192524,0.000005473934,0.000003520691,0.00002547929,0.000009513256,0.9950664,0.002842564,0.0016734,0.0002391328,0.000005707956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3530461,0.00250723,0.5437105,0.001248083,0.00009539076,0.000190758,0.000198373,0.0004488128,0.0985547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984872,0.0009281616,0.01072547,0.00004792225,0.00002215276,0.00003892226,0.00005618796,0.00004192445,0.003267241],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002993104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008812487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007252857852510601,"score_gpt":0.1892444830841456,"score_spread":0.181991625231635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}