{"id":"W2557603865","doi":"10.1177/1354066116679244","title":"Artificial persons and attributed actions: How to interpret action-sentences about states","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Relations","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Action (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Attributive; Literal and figurative language; Linguistics; Typology; State (computer science); Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008872081,0.001070033,0.0008111039,0.002543776,0.003058597,0.007763915,0.00186215,0.003518981,0.00602204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01958442,0.0006790325,0.001349053,0.001393295,0.02424572,0.02492372,0.004047929,0.004518935,0.001263793],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002632034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001334002,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002996982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001919415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9911327,0.006645211,0.000542118,0.0007800572,0.0006066069,0.0002933505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898463,0.007197871,0.0005765421,0.001104776,0.001001856,0.0002726781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001205651,0.000004904356,0.0001180455,0.00006277928,0.000009377,0.00007955141,0.01004942,0.0002497656,0.0002134372,0.9844635,0.001046638,0.003690472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000163901,0.00001157015,0.0001433524,0.00009430916,0.00001510192,0.0001006717,0.004269249,0.003053999,0.0006191317,0.9567783,0.03487485,0.00002308625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03786707,0.003844771,0.7746524,0.02764741,0.002007532,0.0002377928,0.0004223374,0.001176063,0.1521446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7746471,0.001376308,0.21053,0.002927026,0.000621775,0.0003045035,0.0004698424,0.00048939,0.008634125],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008872081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0469206,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1001982935613431,"score_gpt":0.2927816586436426,"score_spread":0.1925833650822995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}