{"id":"W2558019135","doi":"10.3390/f7120303","title":"Evaluation of Whole Tree Growth Increment Derived from Tree-Ring Series for Use in Assessments of Changes in Forest Productivity across Various Spatial Scales","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forests","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Diameter at breast height; Productivity; Tree (set theory); Environmental science; Spatial variability; Dendrochronology; Predictability; Annual growth %; Thinning; Mathematics; Physical geography; Statistics; Forestry; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001201644,0.0001239649,0.0002123003,0.00006298577,0.00004118415,0.000008631598,0.0001670455,0.00007026198,0.0000521765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002934581,0.00009904705,0.00003151939,0.0001182637,0.0002092131,0.0004405724,0.0002361374,0.00004019835,0.000005119137],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003146401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002034539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006608018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.916749,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986128,0.0001328647,0.0002675628,0.0003262794,0.0003935938,0.0002669201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994262,0.0001070149,0.000180733,0.0002222315,0.00003495405,0.00002889524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002041781,0.0002647203,0.9589042,0.00002643526,0.00002165237,0.000001432421,0.0004117005,0.0008022374,0.01385677,0.0001379924,0.0000279026,0.02534076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001923026,0.000282743,0.9632835,0.00006549824,0.00002668391,2.140072e-7,0.00004980644,0.002191636,0.02164441,0.01040269,0.00002473343,0.0001050408],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953986,0.000009470194,0.003111508,0.0002024807,0.0001115725,0.001014367,0.0000588615,0.000008739509,0.00008444527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984103,0.000006948528,0.0011616,0.000008032088,0.00002013429,0.0003063497,0.00002351364,0.0000106062,0.00005245737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.910141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03235571239569768,"score_gpt":0.2917670259913323,"score_spread":0.2594113135956346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}