{"id":"W2559726834","doi":"10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.11.005","title":"Photochemical reflectance ratio for tracking light use efficiency for sunlit leaves in two forest types","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing","topic":"Remote Sensing in Agriculture","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Canopy; Photochemical Reflectance Index; Leaf area index; Environmental science; Remote sensing; Reflectivity; Atmospheric sciences; Shading; Sunlight; Mathematics; Botany; Optics; Physics; Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; Computer science; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001600025,0.0002168197,0.0001766356,0.001040243,0.0003091502,0.0003188204,0.0003232087,0.0003820263,0.001647073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002403622,0.0001564104,0.0002878491,0.0006107905,0.000140389,0.0003212353,0.000116503,0.0001607692,0.0004869073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003296002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001287346,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009460178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01625633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998946,0.00001023487,0.000006282396,0.0000402184,0.00002828561,0.00002029147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998473,0.00005100426,0.00002223274,0.00001097978,0.00004623931,0.00002220966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001710539,0.0003307418,0.5190585,0.0003097154,0.0002553414,0.0002047097,0.0005731249,0.006548666,0.402717,0.0003528456,0.001031343,0.06690754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001167056,0.00008071439,0.9471298,0.000008779208,0.0001031377,0.0002245019,0.0002563956,0.01282679,0.03888195,0.0000685163,0.0003902577,0.00001745226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958662,0.0001131084,0.002219298,0.000007178096,0.000003548894,0.000007702192,0.0005175591,0.00008981434,0.001175544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976755,0.00004164085,0.001534196,0.000007905877,0.000001339449,0.000009122965,0.0002967445,0.00001310576,0.0004205834],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009460178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01881021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01715509974275928,"score_gpt":0.2812928202547107,"score_spread":0.2641377205119514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}