{"id":"W2559809082","doi":"10.1386/tmsd.15.2.159_1","title":"Cracking the complexity code of charities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Intermediary; Mandate; Altruism (biology); Process (computing); Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Agency (philosophy); Business; Investment (military); Social complexity; Public relations; Code (set theory); Stakeholder; Obligation; Economics; Marketing; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01335152,0.0003455208,0.0004744335,0.005376499,0.006702578,0.009956921,0.001335506,0.001526308,0.004747659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06582913,0.000456173,0.0003596123,0.003496989,0.02769958,0.01236875,0.008760609,0.003199302,0.000317988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008108317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004450469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007176454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0086054,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9807119,0.01063801,0.0007552239,0.001725031,0.005321735,0.0008480811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9243656,0.03865106,0.0119012,0.01232718,0.01064955,0.002105332],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001094724,0.00004025616,0.0257301,0.0001926507,0.00002801788,0.0003062834,0.1470695,0.001370541,0.000952971,0.7714518,0.005091127,0.04765739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001894728,0.00007375224,0.04871418,0.0006010737,0.00003286648,0.0009174978,0.1471796,0.01339573,0.001406566,0.6851271,0.1023741,0.0001586726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.708577,0.0009769176,0.1172176,0.03891508,0.0003340369,0.0003596121,0.000477546,0.0001954318,0.1329467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911948,0.0001219569,0.006508229,0.0002425891,0.00004137726,0.00006580639,0.00005284073,0.00003878958,0.00173366],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01335152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07061046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02582966034803139,"score_gpt":0.2949177046858789,"score_spread":0.2690880443378475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}