{"id":"W2560004879","doi":"","title":"Evaluation of value at risk: An empirical likelihood approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HKBU Institutional Repository (Hong Kong Baptist University)","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Value at risk; Empirical likelihood; Value (mathematics); Econometrics; Computer science; Maximum likelihood; Mathematics; Statistics; Actuarial science; Risk management; Economics; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001444679,0.0001669666,0.0002918926,0.0003373341,0.0007866094,0.00003552622,0.0003209107,0.0002370835,0.0000775856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002874807,0.0002155089,0.0001633502,0.0003527325,0.000321376,0.0005913082,0.0001123121,0.0003704514,0.00005483008],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005060192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000373045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009501016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002037149,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983877,0.00009999734,0.0004470327,0.0005560021,0.0002695998,0.000239685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986444,0.00004272184,0.0003818161,0.000440819,0.0003368474,0.0001534129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001195522,0.0006317581,0.6250036,0.00003445912,0.0001059655,0.0000221462,0.0005284738,0.0203568,0.001399477,0.3497182,0.00008641677,0.001993142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00144127,0.0001069334,0.533136,0.00002197422,0.0001502646,0.00004528588,0.0001135737,0.4393544,0.0006307233,0.00988909,0.01463623,0.0004742662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8915027,0.0001380156,0.01542225,0.00001659735,0.0007445273,0.0001925675,0.00009892119,0.00004336091,0.09184099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942636,0.00001893993,0.004900484,0.000009906912,0.00019475,0.000002066722,0.00005203021,0.00001233613,0.0005458327],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4189976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8788199,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04134675257587277,"score_gpt":0.2365703237680874,"score_spread":0.1952235711922146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}