{"id":"W2560223691","doi":"10.1400/238464","title":"Gli accomodamenti ragionevoli in materia di libertà religiosa tra giurisprudenza della Corte europea e della Corte canadese","year":2015,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Duty; Jurisprudence; Law; Reasonable accommodation; Impartiality; Pluralism (philosophy); Supreme court; Public sphere; Relation (database); State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Sociology; Political science; Constitutional court; Identity (music); Human rights; Constitution; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002004794,0.0002063723,0.0001795632,0.0009634308,0.003988063,0.004908253,0.0004647668,0.00155706,0.006194977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002540678,0.0001452781,0.0001810802,0.001342613,0.005240731,0.001119393,0.002763407,0.003041112,0.0005394051],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00716937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1344815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3190381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977235,0.0005924935,0.00004258272,0.0001890488,0.0007233097,0.0007290696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999325,0.0002149761,0.00008180034,0.0001142026,0.0001421792,0.0001218016],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003414357,0.00003314713,0.004672446,0.0001013853,0.00001291175,0.0003155535,0.01350202,0.0002747796,0.001012176,0.9068117,0.01111569,0.06211396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003263192,0.00006939978,0.03686012,0.0004457367,0.00002982185,0.0003329144,0.009940915,0.0003766415,0.0009994899,0.06648225,0.8843822,0.00004797094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1753855,0.02914334,0.004318424,0.04595443,0.000512369,0.00009689888,0.000164491,0.00008063602,0.7443439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8864535,0.004888584,0.002795877,0.00331977,0.0001240817,0.00003289291,0.00005618515,0.00003112943,0.1022981],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8655186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2673974,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02132801349354167,"score_gpt":0.2785450020323171,"score_spread":0.2572169885387754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}