{"id":"W2560223691","doi":"10.1400/238464","title":"Gli accomodamenti ragionevoli in materia di libertà religiosa tra giurisprudenza della Corte europea e della Corte canadese","year":2015,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neutrality; Duty; Jurisprudence; Law; Reasonable accommodation; Impartiality; Pluralism (philosophy); Supreme court; Public sphere; Relation (database); State (computer science); Freedom of religion; Sociology; Political science; Constitutional court; Identity (music); Human rights; Constitution; Philosophy; Politics; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001657909,0.0006138693,0.0007426281,0.000673382,0.0005507118,0.0007145311,0.001235862,0.0007171191,0.0002620312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002451254,0.0007242853,0.000274118,0.00148744,0.0009225079,0.0008332094,0.0003163077,0.000577344,0.0004567205],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001428115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001591375,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1649201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03508944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941748,0.001602712,0.0006762109,0.000963885,0.001178418,0.001403999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970286,0.0003097205,0.0005138014,0.0006770833,0.0003386397,0.001132094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001753821,0.001561697,0.05671406,0.0002806596,0.0004646841,0.008406799,0.1735467,0.002418117,0.00562707,0.241967,0.4993973,0.007862202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02305954,0.001484072,0.1574385,0.001097351,0.001479188,0.0002943336,0.08682664,0.01057936,0.001448677,0.07714806,0.6328516,0.00629271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7219064,0.0008247924,0.0002325323,0.00148904,0.001784742,0.0006573664,0.00008699595,0.000150754,0.2728674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851615,0.003283625,0.0002413266,0.0004420222,0.0005694533,0.00001311165,0.00008366672,0.0001005135,0.01010474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2632552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02132801349354167,"score_gpt":0.2785450020323171,"score_spread":0.2572169885387754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}