{"id":"W2560307214","doi":"10.1115/detc2016-59165","title":"Quantitative Analysis of the Effort-Fatigue Tradeoff in the Conceptual Design Process: A Multistate EEG Approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Rule of thumb; Process (computing); Meaning (existential); Perspective (graphical); Cognition; Task (project management); Electroencephalography; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Psychology; Systems engineering; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005539099,0.00009085941,0.0001453299,0.0001006095,0.00002945973,0.00001612758,0.000252332,0.0000336942,0.0001230396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001687378,0.00003930815,0.00006210753,0.0009843567,0.00009487387,0.0001716168,0.000004919244,0.00008698567,0.000007243942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002124907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000368581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003536004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003900474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991928,0.000196316,0.0002121591,0.000108172,0.0001642328,0.0001263751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987954,0.0008742229,0.0000591841,0.0002107668,0.0000395082,0.00002086125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002925192,0.001065698,0.01479851,0.0002244744,0.00350504,0.000004231712,0.3231952,0.4967256,0.01766225,0.113969,0.01155844,0.01699911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001886265,0.0001721103,0.1359101,0.00007632289,0.001250202,0.000007772283,0.0950759,0.7507749,0.009748867,0.0009405466,0.003473809,0.0006832038],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1557919,0.0001435309,0.8218167,0.0008380705,0.0001124014,0.0006532813,0.00001622842,0.00007166555,0.02055628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948839,0.00001605075,0.004677427,0.00008502182,0.0000053589,0.00006305599,0.000002051166,0.000008657786,0.0002584778],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.839092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.160294,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09193376957806275,"score_gpt":0.3214190686571468,"score_spread":0.229485299079084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}