{"id":"W2560499676","doi":"10.1016/j.lingua.2016.10.001","title":"(De-)constructing evidentiality","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lingua","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"NOSM University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Presentational and representational acting; Proposition; Evidentiality; Contradiction; Assertion; Linguistics; Common ground; Perspective (graphical); Subject (documents); Presentation (obstetrics); Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Communication; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003037103,0.00008099697,0.0001041271,0.00004328546,0.0001575927,0.0001515983,0.000105675,0.00003267193,0.002121156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001418093,0.00005941141,0.00005243477,0.00001259138,0.0001035875,0.00008989005,0.00003241358,0.00005076776,0.0003384487],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004402134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003906224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007201817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003816751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992815,0.0000376093,0.0002066058,0.0001535814,0.00012449,0.0001962451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937,0.0001807756,0.0001041429,0.000177855,0.0001259068,0.00004125731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005482685,0.00001433984,0.003949094,0.00001737334,0.00002385887,0.000005529804,0.01876538,2.691203e-7,0.0007856788,0.9584075,0.0001102067,0.01791531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008241916,0.000050831,0.00176718,0.0003821662,0.0001076069,0.00001889402,0.008268946,0.0001238209,0.006314545,0.8834885,0.09813981,0.0005134927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.850963,0.00007700548,0.006989621,0.01922967,0.008683706,0.00019809,0.0000248361,0.0006813332,0.1131527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912859,0.000003027335,0.0009640963,0.0001510896,0.00454766,0.000003067661,8.841786e-7,0.00001941902,0.00302483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1403229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998791,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03621329840332892,"score_gpt":0.2635008833794192,"score_spread":0.2272875849760903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}