{"id":"W2560618878","doi":"10.1002/eap.1477","title":"Moving beyond the concept of “primary forest” as a metric of forest environment quality","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Natural Resources Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Ecology; Metric (unit); Quality (philosophy); Geography; Forest ecology; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Old-growth forest; Agroforestry; Ecosystem; Biology; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003229547,0.00009285669,0.0001611982,0.00002911208,0.000102178,0.000004919386,0.0004378436,0.00005557249,0.005428703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000682212,0.00004836392,0.00008532112,0.000268653,0.0007009061,0.00006779088,0.0003884157,0.00005172471,0.001053822],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006859066,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001932357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005889232,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989821,0.00006196255,0.0003218208,0.0002136238,0.0002362461,0.0001843015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988096,0.0005192404,0.0002070786,0.0004030199,0.000004916511,0.00005613126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002497174,0.0008220916,0.5696951,0.00001809814,0.00004429925,6.383763e-7,0.0001843973,0.001896239,0.004991894,0.3625861,0.008735852,0.05100032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000212731,0.00009633901,0.9079934,0.000001441311,0.00001830532,4.338412e-7,0.00001522697,0.0000297267,0.0003898032,0.03272387,0.05843419,0.00008455166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8771022,0.00006463507,0.006226081,0.002736202,0.00002030749,0.001022682,0.00004077836,0.00002962961,0.1127575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955767,0.00004309394,0.0008134184,0.000347348,0.00002439456,0.0002944476,0.000008417837,0.00000519466,0.002886972],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3382983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999724,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01720418395594232,"score_gpt":0.2557364132163903,"score_spread":0.238532229260448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}