{"id":"W2560665552","doi":"10.1109/re.2016.61","title":"Requirements Engineering Visualization: A Systematic Literature Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Visualization; Computer science; Requirements engineering; Process (computing); Systematic review; Perspective (graphical); Software engineering; Data science; Requirements analysis; Data visualization; Information visualization; Software; Systems engineering; Data mining; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02696199,0.001923987,0.005555992,0.04706649,0.001310898,0.002874183,0.00267127,0.002216725,0.004992478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1068264,0.001411063,0.005340644,0.03378086,0.001201423,0.004980767,0.003149604,0.001263158,0.0007530585],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006085414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02763994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006905055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01934946,"domain_scores_codex":[0.974964,0.009452951,0.009596328,0.001399944,0.004132241,0.0004544394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8992388,0.07310146,0.01148611,0.002200027,0.01314129,0.0008324501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001082177,0.00004232298,0.001038446,0.8612697,0.002029619,0.0004304693,0.00152351,0.0003424943,0.0004551998,0.0009691944,0.004874673,0.1269161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007759506,0.0001202387,0.002041544,0.952192,0.007425493,0.0004976116,0.001590098,0.0001666617,0.0003027632,0.0007207664,0.03481562,0.00004956432],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004818132,0.9816864,0.003784653,0.0016113,0.0002619478,0.003566462,0.002442524,0.00007122268,0.0017574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03361055,0.9461901,0.01082823,0.00110989,0.0001091316,0.006055936,0.001647321,0.00003970263,0.0004090921],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.973038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1425904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01971300742911301,"score_gpt":0.2960467260133942,"score_spread":0.2763337185842812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}