{"id":"W2560696316","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.001","title":"Criteria for use of composite end points for competing risks—a systematic survey of the literature with recommendations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"CINAHL; MEDLINE; Systematic review; Medicine; Event (particle physics); Point (geometry); Computer science; Psychological intervention; Mathematics; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04956318,0.0004069332,0.01202804,0.0001790643,0.00006309884,0.00001312344,0.0007914617,0.0007557995,0.00001509909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3249552,0.0001798331,0.002016613,0.0002134355,0.0003705042,0.0001634134,0.0001298424,0.0009711696,4.620203e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006175356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003382297,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006600521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001844991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9693179,0.01769355,0.01218512,0.0003000036,0.0001793538,0.0003240801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6370753,0.3387317,0.02186072,0.0005664137,0.001673365,0.00009247061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001212903,0.000944311,0.003516629,0.762769,0.004694654,0.000004985527,0.0001639143,0.000004055874,0.000005300879,0.05194521,0.01387756,0.1608615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001239915,0.00204922,0.0004691395,0.8052574,0.00323213,0.0002747625,0.00001439276,0.00009253559,0.000007447662,0.1367113,0.0502129,0.0004387757],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001446682,0.4902066,0.5006692,0.0008769692,0.001168619,0.004433148,0.002462747,0.00002511614,0.0000129304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001161742,0.5954651,0.4038821,0.0001256775,0.0001989692,0.00008568482,0.00004239814,0.00005579324,0.00002814991],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3322426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9786747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8235246654930325,"score_gpt":0.6620055426811549,"score_spread":0.1615191228118776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}