{"id":"W2560730920","doi":"10.22495/cocv14i1c2p3","title":"A comparison of different approaches to modeling financial statements","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Corporate Ownership and Control","topic":"Financial Reporting and XBRL","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Entity–relationship model; Object (grammar); Strengths and weaknesses; Relational model; Adaptability; Set (abstract data type); Conceptual model; Computer science; Accounting; Relational database; Compliance (psychology); Object model; Knowledge management; Process management; Business; Data mining; Psychology; Database; Artificial intelligence; Management; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01110899,0.001137985,0.0007615823,0.008617772,0.001258307,0.007250785,0.003328188,0.001526073,0.004359059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01631513,0.0007240384,0.002248315,0.01193057,0.00251732,0.008027551,0.002231849,0.002029596,0.000675677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00426256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003554936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01419225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01336595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901214,0.004284006,0.000924752,0.000466636,0.003887972,0.0003152278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899808,0.006027232,0.001061198,0.0009332484,0.001792154,0.0002053667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007207163,0.0001390041,0.004718017,0.0008503302,0.0001204027,0.0001997152,0.002653275,0.0340585,0.000576976,0.8228973,0.002843168,0.1308711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001056358,0.0002439922,0.007573926,0.003124159,0.0004011322,0.0007223755,0.008227798,0.257494,0.003030334,0.441105,0.2776829,0.000288775],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04704581,0.01749404,0.8380291,0.007781949,0.000386054,0.0005279466,0.0009774429,0.001289297,0.08646837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2453437,0.02754889,0.7159557,0.0008638326,0.0002072706,0.0007693718,0.001838973,0.0003672054,0.007104968],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01419225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05875069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2185025594416006,"score_gpt":0.2841737220635949,"score_spread":0.06567116262199435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}