{"id":"W2561205694","doi":"","title":"ANALYSIS OF THE RELATION OF COPYRIGHT AND WORK CONTENT IN JUDICIAL VERDICTS OF USA, UK AND CANADA","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Work (physics); Content (measure theory); Law; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Mathematics; Database","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001002361,0.0001231466,0.000626143,0.0003887093,0.00006400548,0.0001229252,0.001408765,0.00005450162,0.0003375998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003843398,0.00008103128,0.00007676505,0.001460046,0.0002448359,0.0006611993,0.00067579,0.0001454643,1.783309e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007760948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003745258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3124216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1192976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980737,0.0002415075,0.0007106221,0.0002220089,0.0006034552,0.0001487121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981666,0.0002692367,0.000708667,0.0003435212,0.0003897503,0.0001222551],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001191667,0.00006150501,0.9818043,0.00002154913,0.0002744135,0.000002983167,0.0008891401,0.0004080748,0.004500929,0.0002361198,0.008895641,0.002786197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000376696,0.0000173929,0.9818676,0.0001834836,0.0001201149,0.000001573811,0.00004800914,0.003105108,0.01279511,0.0009495933,0.0004245809,0.0001107101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917196,0.004335943,0.001133936,0.000131809,0.000256301,0.0001903963,0.00001066595,0.000001966359,0.002219391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988769,0.0007839476,0.0001205684,0.000108726,0.00001497111,0.000002311256,8.527408e-7,0.000005135702,0.00008657844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.193124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8967729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2827412107880249,"score_gpt":0.4521551034987038,"score_spread":0.1694138927106789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}