{"id":"W2561364701","doi":"10.3138/utlj.67.1","title":"MITIGATING STATE SOVEREIGNTY: THE DUTY TO CONSULT WITH INDIGENOUS PEOPLES","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Duty; Sovereignty; Human rights; Duty to protect; Indigenous rights; Political science; Conceptualization; Law; State (computer science); Law and economics; Power (physics); Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006148047,0.00009771078,0.0001719056,0.0000114424,0.01492801,0.0003003303,0.0009075121,0.00005216563,0.00102325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004281281,0.00006793724,0.0000759055,0.00001874013,0.0008237166,0.0006434146,0.0000831533,0.0001565512,0.0000114234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003251259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006309229,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6020645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9707142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988176,0.0001266011,0.0001103,0.0001267265,0.000428702,0.0003900778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987676,0.0001006565,0.0003542822,0.0002619668,0.0002925445,0.0002229473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001808273,0.00007747208,0.005908334,0.00001113927,0.0001618668,0.000159412,0.7575135,0.0000468148,0.00004168322,0.2308759,0.0005790812,0.004444025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001851518,0.0005863131,0.03720937,0.0002350604,0.0001637845,0.00008545768,0.5214623,0.000007732067,0.0002185198,0.003929036,0.4336605,0.0005903491],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6737564,0.0001071232,0.0001580413,0.0009172335,0.0001589774,0.000222806,0.00002815117,0.00001652753,0.3246348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958134,0.0002601127,0.0008786705,0.0001032749,0.000144584,6.96567e-8,6.545759e-7,0.000006602991,0.002792576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4330814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01102152311945175,"score_gpt":0.2380445124845087,"score_spread":0.227022989365057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}