{"id":"W2561384884","doi":"10.1093/jof/108.6.274","title":"Rebuilding Spatial Forest Inventories from Aggregated Data","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forestry","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Genome Canada","keywords":"Forest inventory; Forest management; Scale (ratio); Grid; Forest ecology; Spatial ecology; Computer science; Tree (set theory); Data set; Data quality; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Geography; Cartography; Agroforestry; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Operations management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003935418,0.00009984252,0.0001491378,0.00003715903,0.00009692584,0.00003503167,0.001179099,0.0001056531,0.001906376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004777149,0.0000808287,0.00003989627,0.00008889167,0.000208367,0.0005451648,0.0008266118,0.0004374696,0.00010757],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000369286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002379295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007589677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006667202,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990276,0.00002365852,0.0003199745,0.0001660276,0.0002707336,0.0001920475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988243,0.0000760594,0.0003435565,0.0006252166,0.00001220101,0.0001186769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006452638,0.00007531068,0.9449621,0.000003267843,0.00004548613,0.0001281519,0.00006580317,0.0004305296,0.001578302,0.0008196222,0.04978385,0.002043009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005436799,0.0001236935,0.904896,0.00002084987,0.0000536522,0.00003573273,0.0000459483,0.001082824,0.0004605718,0.04251128,0.0501007,0.0001251276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946664,0.0000280871,0.00112474,0.0006029449,0.00160752,0.00006165107,0.00001271976,0.00001173096,0.001884202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945114,0.00001954767,0.00466944,0.0001883821,0.0004185144,9.139848e-7,0.00002031896,0.000009607433,0.0001618846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04169166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01422820748463684,"score_gpt":0.2425794513086091,"score_spread":0.2283512438239723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}