{"id":"W2561804198","doi":"10.1111/jori.12172","title":"Dynamic Moral Hazard: A Longitudinal Examination of Automobile Insurance in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk & Insurance","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Spurious relationship; Moral hazard; Context (archaeology); Econometrics; Economics; Actuarial science; Hazard; Panel data; Microeconomics; Statistics; Incentive; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002101675,0.0002110293,0.000414958,0.0022099,0.002816928,0.00144987,0.00135697,0.0007064089,0.00280296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006855024,0.000281966,0.000551375,0.005010341,0.0008011734,0.0005920344,0.001489819,0.001524361,0.0002496601],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02088525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02882813,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.988888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904537,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987134,0.0001388505,0.00005885365,0.000179055,0.0004461449,0.0004638306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923339,0.000915819,0.002020683,0.000380596,0.002904109,0.001444894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004180729,0.00009063385,0.9926577,0.00001146062,0.00004541455,0.0001092064,0.001433194,0.000405001,0.00008786871,0.000562056,0.0007056447,0.003850062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003866748,0.00002385139,0.9946424,0.00002539901,0.00001965029,0.00003768038,0.001757372,0.001816217,0.0000581742,0.0001601842,0.001437632,0.00001755661],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953489,0.0002439594,0.0002087599,0.0005079583,0.000005906372,0.00002873386,0.002380191,0.000005913462,0.001269668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969847,0.000162938,0.0001594189,0.00005840436,0.000004055353,0.00001046282,0.001593813,0.000002909255,0.001023251],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02088525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1515338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01312593179293512,"score_gpt":0.2015730232877287,"score_spread":0.1884470914947936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}