{"id":"W2562716524","doi":"10.18438/b86d14","title":"Expressing Intellectual Freedom: A Content Analysis of Catholic Library World from 1980 to 2015","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Catholicism and Religious Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Intellectual freedom; Context (archaeology); Reading (process); Library science; Index (typography); Professional association; Sociology; Content analysis; Law; Political science; Media studies; History; Computer science; Social science; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001683676,0.0001578464,0.0002941272,0.000759053,0.0002326751,0.000463804,0.0001890444,0.00003417754,0.001741149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008564238,0.0001018306,0.0001022593,0.0003946217,0.0002052496,0.08591712,0.0001907968,0.00009216812,0.0001022953],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006498079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007709648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001855419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006201218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987859,0.0001216527,0.0005400119,0.0001571741,0.0002274251,0.0001678705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958784,0.003326244,0.0003437864,0.0002630056,0.00007802132,0.0001105444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002618948,0.0001985018,0.002131699,0.0001638115,0.001254729,0.000009542218,0.2002533,0.0001700198,0.001058632,0.5935456,0.1708331,0.0277622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002837485,0.0001089604,0.001765816,0.0005034951,0.0004471444,9.960879e-7,0.004615781,0.0003042034,0.002052017,0.00008255822,0.9896303,0.0002049823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4625739,0.01710306,0.006307949,0.3469456,0.001686077,0.001560282,0.001884001,0.0008744011,0.1610648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9462541,0.003698936,0.002103351,0.04220833,0.0003560289,0.00004815634,0.0001077532,0.00001805493,0.005205318],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8187972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991714,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04445837684632331,"score_gpt":0.2556794510850041,"score_spread":0.2112210742386808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}