{"id":"W2563295921","doi":"10.1007/s00707-016-1777-0","title":"Nonlinear vibration analysis of a microbeam subject to electrostatic force","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Mechanica","topic":"Mechanical and Optical Resonators","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Microbeam; Nonlinear system; Frequency response; Mechanics; Voltage; Vibration; Materials science; Beam (structure); Boundary value problem; Acoustics; Dimensionless quantity; Physics; Direct current; Optics; Engineering; Electrical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001543523,0.0002242632,0.0002338692,0.0002693913,0.0002899156,0.0002719769,0.0003391012,0.0006884998,0.002264906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004279771,0.0001111084,0.000233631,0.0001173594,0.0005569543,0.0002624159,0.0003174446,0.0003013708,0.0003196586],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002853487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002125539,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00183914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001036838,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999182,0.0000142375,0.00000232309,0.00001520336,0.00003468788,0.00001537065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998697,0.00006815709,0.00001525118,0.000008327364,0.00002356642,0.00001492128],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006716492,0.0001283481,0.003711845,0.0003091436,0.00009363481,0.001618796,0.0006297595,0.1550595,0.774029,0.03560215,0.001317361,0.02682879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001379055,0.0001225937,0.005668961,0.000007361849,0.00001127461,0.0001535646,0.00009646529,0.9797134,0.01193398,0.001511555,0.0007510676,0.00001603293],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8710611,0.0006200774,0.1075131,0.0006237401,0.0001120754,0.00005865308,0.00009803601,0.0001608636,0.01975242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850996,0.0001343744,0.003988424,0.0000459492,0.00003443518,0.00001676848,0.00003897349,0.00002880937,0.01061262],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002264906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007576883,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00687360083475111,"score_gpt":0.2419342528628869,"score_spread":0.2350606520281358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}