{"id":"W2563787385","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2016.12.008","title":"New environmental technology uptake and bias toward the status quo: The case of phytoremediation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Genome Canada","keywords":"Status quo; Phytoremediation; Human decontamination; Status quo bias; Environmental planning; Human health; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Business; Political science; Waste management; Contamination; Engineering; Environmental health; Ecology; Medicine; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003564295,0.0002138891,0.0001856096,0.000157642,0.0007854707,0.00004258437,0.0006451571,0.0002750719,0.0002679231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001003487,0.0001415759,0.00003484707,0.0003464233,0.001961023,0.0002571678,0.0008133153,0.000346733,0.00006851514],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002389254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001223936,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000257741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002152193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984723,0.00003120051,0.0004554326,0.0004219942,0.0002318776,0.0003871848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983238,0.0000370278,0.0006358435,0.0009586751,0.00000277874,0.00004184749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001379006,0.00008161159,0.5840789,0.000006174109,0.00003198811,0.00004453232,0.000498805,0.00005287615,0.270183,0.003982751,0.0001642753,0.1408613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002254287,0.0007110272,0.7518101,0.00005617298,0.0001330447,0.001989156,0.01462202,0.003151142,0.1845297,0.02644847,0.01333546,0.0009594082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935768,0.0002427005,0.0005186589,0.004518067,0.0001727392,0.0004955268,0.00003351264,0.0000465017,0.0003954451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986011,0.0003324611,0.0006883628,0.00007802433,0.00003277171,0.00004131265,0.00001491925,0.00001928593,0.0001917211],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1677312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7225472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01145262317791319,"score_gpt":0.2275816509901954,"score_spread":0.2161290278122822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}