{"id":"W2563787385","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2016.12.008","title":"New environmental technology uptake and bias toward the status quo: The case of phytoremediation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Genome Canada","keywords":"Status quo; Phytoremediation; Human decontamination; Status quo bias; Environmental planning; Human health; Environmental science; Environmental protection; Business; Political science; Waste management; Contamination; Engineering; Environmental health; Ecology; Medicine; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004548272,0.0002322424,0.000585362,0.0008435879,0.002898351,0.004488958,0.0007790059,0.004210009,0.005992011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00985429,0.0001724008,0.0004799936,0.000953415,0.007141399,0.004688874,0.003482645,0.001925757,0.0002396197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003009495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001625062,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007792077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01071619,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982509,0.000722665,0.00004469344,0.0002484815,0.0002120073,0.0005211117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942274,0.003611324,0.0006907593,0.0006587218,0.0004017717,0.0004099891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005543408,0.0002391755,0.03916855,0.0001536262,0.000176513,0.004633765,0.007513321,0.01108329,0.01298502,0.8926725,0.002456927,0.02836293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002439407,0.0003880321,0.04346875,0.0001209881,0.0001824658,0.001877807,0.02203819,0.02700485,0.01075991,0.8675641,0.02619129,0.0001596134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9291881,0.0005745577,0.00556551,0.01051331,0.00004041013,0.00002643162,0.00004992365,0.0000167695,0.05402497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983772,0.0001067964,0.0004677971,0.0001179729,0.000006378511,0.000004627128,0.000003843747,0.000003153291,0.0009121593],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007792077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02405381,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01145262317791319,"score_gpt":0.2275816509901954,"score_spread":0.2161290278122822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}