{"id":"W2564105862","doi":"10.1002/ecy.1682","title":"A global database of ant species abundances","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Habitat; Macroecology; Geography; Biomass (ecology); Sampling (signal processing); Assemblage (archaeology); Ecosystem; Spatial ecology; Community structure; Species richness; Biology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00128472,0.0007103359,0.001085352,0.01025728,0.0004283236,0.001359299,0.000863686,0.00048717,0.007843047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00565773,0.0005368264,0.0005689049,0.01396164,0.0002293853,0.001546397,0.001326987,0.0008277407,0.008035258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003600947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001313937,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005001611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007601336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986191,0.0001768652,0.0003889519,0.0004188373,0.000299507,0.0000967531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913408,0.001350562,0.002693849,0.001889913,0.00198045,0.0007444495],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009548204,0.0003033435,0.5057091,0.004445896,0.0008084116,0.0005104427,0.001304462,0.003141654,0.01329501,0.004613684,0.1634072,0.301506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072112,0.000161039,0.5918872,0.0005195497,0.000256615,0.001322985,0.000585384,0.001981163,0.003483589,0.002076598,0.3975727,0.00008103435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","genre_scores_codex":[0.09575648,0.004185392,0.01198744,0.0002963769,0.00009594875,0.0002246255,0.8645101,0.001624388,0.02131926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08292264,0.002391115,0.0200443,0.0001668655,0.00006765666,0.0005074732,0.8906068,0.0002384528,0.003054726],"genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01025728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02623761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0114400039437855,"score_gpt":0.257874436276197,"score_spread":0.2464344323324115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}