{"id":"W2564303678","doi":"10.1109/itherm.2002.1012456","title":"Effect of surface asperity truncation on thermal contact conductance","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Thermal contact conductance; Asperity (geotechnical engineering); Materials science; Conductance; Surface roughness; Surface finish; Contact area; Thermal; Surface (topology); Truncation (statistics); Mechanics; Gaussian; Thermal conductivity; Optics; Composite material; Thermal resistance; Thermodynamics; Geometry; Condensed matter physics; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001644644,0.0001050511,0.0001384473,0.00002421501,0.0000462284,0.00000834008,0.00004300503,0.00005237808,0.0006344643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005453086,0.0000856113,0.00005300536,0.00009288765,0.00001137664,0.000131539,0.000001634896,0.00009913238,0.00008580609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004935497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008946588,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003115987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001440889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994786,0.00007867581,0.0001465214,0.00009458645,0.00009294348,0.0001086939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995238,0.0002262737,0.00002297351,0.0001573469,0.00003574561,0.00003388847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009540308,0.0001014348,0.02708923,0.0001276295,0.0001090925,0.000002023592,0.0005668073,0.08688235,0.8690475,0.01181868,0.002855755,0.001304053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003897903,0.000292456,0.009883,0.00002260345,0.00001542987,0.000003766507,0.00007606038,0.005939767,0.9786103,0.00003139061,0.004584365,0.0001510503],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9271764,0.00007390458,0.0009925971,0.000009667817,0.0005145815,0.0001203949,0.000003506234,0.0001404143,0.0709686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990565,0.00002741303,0.0001959432,0.000009102575,0.0000141871,0.000004067965,0.000002905797,0.00001439427,0.0006755304],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1095628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6946939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007229981360799624,"score_gpt":0.2334582832211321,"score_spread":0.2262283018603324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}