{"id":"W2564333862","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2016-0346","title":"Scaling relationships for strip fibre–reinforced aggregates","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; University of Southampton","keywords":"Ballast; Scaling; Materials science; Granular material; Grain size; Geotechnical engineering; Consistency (knowledge bases); Void ratio; Aggregate (composite); Composite material; Void (composites); Geology; Mathematics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004303442,0.0001617575,0.000170686,0.0002371203,0.0002463204,0.00007141924,0.0002274652,0.0002901705,0.00006524903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001220232,0.0001272,0.0001280539,0.0002207439,0.00004528417,0.0001810919,0.000009865774,0.0004076041,0.00003219172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004208168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001353502,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000155682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002962492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987969,0.00001864288,0.0003760483,0.000136349,0.0001409413,0.0005311659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998627,0.0003255174,0.00003827927,0.0002013524,0.0001041438,0.0007037262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005146921,0.000002141442,0.00002478881,0.00002057283,0.00002405071,0.00001091748,0.00001767354,0.9525145,0.001544186,0.002838206,0.002718515,0.04027933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001096766,0.00009254161,0.001292306,0.0003924283,0.00004051176,0.0003096263,0.00003673783,0.8296269,0.0009732751,0.005514767,0.1599809,0.0006433504],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0261834,0.0004628391,0.9694795,0.00184211,0.0005953205,0.0003015703,0.00006380289,0.0006661823,0.0004052867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982711,0.0001122606,0.001050779,0.00004503191,0.00023258,0.00002242549,0.000007959925,0.00004741873,0.0002104123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9720877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5187064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0160806362784752,"score_gpt":0.1955499484364709,"score_spread":0.1794693121579957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}