{"id":"W2564423956","doi":"10.6339/jds.201407_12(3).0001","title":"Factorial ANOVA with unbalanced data: A fresh look at the types of sums of squares","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Data Science","topic":"Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Factorial; Factorial analysis; Analysis of variance; Statistics; Type (biology); Econometrics; Mathematics; Factorial experiment; Explained sum of squares; Lack-of-fit sum of squares; Generalized least squares; Computer science; Arithmetic; Psychology; Non-linear least squares","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007997203,0.00008831879,0.0005194033,0.00004790227,0.00007043596,0.00004492459,0.002866848,0.00004080647,0.0002216073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1147987,0.00004559166,0.0000371144,0.0006063238,0.001471959,0.0006638664,0.001430363,0.0002194242,0.000001908252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002700373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007903302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001093551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005547603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970808,0.0003009108,0.0009388548,0.0002832031,0.001221004,0.0001752097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769497,0.01895624,0.001209696,0.002039701,0.0007513733,0.00009330993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004687378,0.002414256,0.03666034,0.001418672,0.001262873,0.0005066034,0.001682416,0.0001075556,0.5707844,0.1781355,0.1538323,0.04850769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006842674,0.002210353,0.01025588,0.001979161,0.001185572,0.0004495072,0.001498645,0.001543183,0.378513,0.5848663,0.01001384,0.0006418028],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.5575567,0.0008891036,0.4217253,0.001905457,0.005918542,0.0005733939,0.009597329,0.00001854846,0.001815557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2052263,0.0000989788,0.7941126,0.00004431044,0.0004563261,3.222787e-7,0.00000754377,0.000009523447,0.00004416821],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4067309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8926578,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7074570963113356,"score_gpt":0.5968141994031163,"score_spread":0.1106428969082193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}