{"id":"W2564754739","doi":"10.1007/s10584-016-1880-1","title":"No evidence of publication bias in climate change science","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Climatic Change","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Stantec (Canada)","funders":"Kungliga Fysiografiska Sällskapet i Lund","keywords":"Publication bias; Popularity; Climate change; Funnel plot; Prestige; Sample (material); Scientific consensus; Impact factor; Sample size determination; Psychology; Econometrics; Political science; Statistics; Global warming; Economics; Social psychology; Mathematics; MEDLINE; Law; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002560929,0.0001325848,0.0002095472,0.0001478197,0.00008244636,0.00002916111,0.0005047231,0.00006048996,0.002649978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00120849,0.00009303129,0.00004632941,0.0008541137,0.0006599911,0.00191225,0.0005152403,0.00005731217,0.001195352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003182111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000149469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003875692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002153481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998069,0.00006280182,0.0004463948,0.0004430704,0.0004779799,0.0005007774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986987,0.0003143838,0.0002191185,0.0006009851,0.00005129012,0.0001155832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001303413,0.00073701,0.7306864,0.0006975526,0.000004430476,0.000004810938,0.008800336,0.000004935303,0.1548275,0.005662771,0.0003180646,0.09812591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00191074,0.0008082783,0.9516329,0.004714564,0.00004551178,0.00001630661,0.0003001794,0.02364831,0.006911932,0.006038241,0.002861444,0.001111564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871781,0.00006854191,0.00006264989,0.002921361,0.0001953101,0.000814539,0.00002290757,0.00004354335,0.008693063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978796,0.0006265739,0.0006818032,0.00039335,0.00005293154,0.0002821193,0.000001732038,0.00001008182,0.00007185632],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2209466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995824,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2487063750287247,"score_gpt":0.3358905603523296,"score_spread":0.08718418532360492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}