{"id":"W2564890402","doi":"10.1093/jpe/rtw128","title":"Altitudinal patterns of maximum plant height on the Tibetan Plateau","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Plant Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Altitude (triangle); Herbaceous plant; Ecology; Plateau (mathematics); Elevation (ballistics); Range (aeronautics); Biology; Woody plant; Plant species; Physical geography; Geography; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004487471,0.00008740066,0.0002153136,0.00004669227,0.0001013219,0.000002504223,0.0002243421,0.0000725932,0.001731384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006552851,0.00004075803,0.00006468807,0.0000349234,0.0001567585,0.0000642897,0.00007136479,0.0001485695,0.0001365141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008272009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001481479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008590493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009733277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991368,0.0001025247,0.0003414204,0.00009428604,0.0001412469,0.0001837291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987519,0.000689068,0.0004139525,0.00008902898,0.00001385692,0.00004219234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000250399,0.0001678863,0.9817991,0.000004790866,0.0001481805,0.000166824,0.0002262111,0.0001913473,0.002422802,0.005741404,0.00834774,0.0005333247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006039146,0.0009236287,0.9896061,0.00003359988,0.00003309004,0.0003820361,0.00008165426,0.00008642126,0.0006697081,0.003954025,0.003544822,0.00008098811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930035,0.00001506413,0.000220841,0.004331253,0.0004708123,0.00006839642,0.00008966895,0.000003034165,0.001797434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990638,0.0001599021,0.00007461991,0.0003740125,0.00004862865,0.000002312558,0.000001268615,0.000004015082,0.0002714229],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007807022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01187572058862101,"score_gpt":0.2101202919169921,"score_spread":0.1982445713283711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}