{"id":"W2565010884","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2016.0042","title":"Reading in Review: The Victorian Book Review in the New Media Moment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian periodicals review","topic":"Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impulse (physics); Reading (process); Print culture; Literature; Identity (music); Print media; History; Art; Aesthetics; Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Law; Newspaper","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009063706,0.0002206867,0.0007720672,0.008683351,0.00293187,0.01161694,0.0008052522,0.0017729,0.002331544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0460052,0.0003899732,0.0002484423,0.0114069,0.00815545,0.004515767,0.001915499,0.00367581,0.0006804496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01250238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0251594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0329723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1258818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898183,0.004363305,0.0006835812,0.0005527993,0.004181021,0.0004009666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.950637,0.03281314,0.002885672,0.001510134,0.00988536,0.00226872],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006869216,0.00003582027,0.001692287,0.008203641,0.0001006363,0.0006884934,0.0469914,0.0002359326,0.001213811,0.1614773,0.5896986,0.1895935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002161329,0.00001021999,0.002041398,0.004272452,0.00001834456,0.0001720519,0.004899142,0.00004816458,0.0001092913,0.00437327,0.9840412,0.00001240475],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01024654,0.8140581,0.001401938,0.08986542,0.01765769,0.00007814822,0.0001669354,0.00004969123,0.06647567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1754975,0.6772678,0.00341974,0.05187383,0.01736436,0.0002583167,0.0003069005,0.0002176955,0.07379393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0329723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09071147,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01949576016691967,"score_gpt":0.2575537433928602,"score_spread":0.2380579832259406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}