{"id":"W2565686132","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2015-0004","title":"STIFFNESS AND DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF A PLANAR CLASS-2 TENSEGRITY MECHANISM","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Structural Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tensegrity; Stiffness; Mechanism (biology); Kinematics; Planar; Direct stiffness method; Structural engineering; Basis (linear algebra); Stiffness matrix; Class (philosophy); Computer science; Control theory (sociology); Mathematics; Geometry; Engineering; Physics; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013547,0.0003166943,0.0002487855,0.0004038342,0.0002047725,0.0002988592,0.0003988,0.0005088777,0.002731419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003320929,0.0001683041,0.0003231671,0.0001919903,0.0003739362,0.0002930706,0.0003305896,0.0001492455,0.0002637875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001825961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002958651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002053621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009793866,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999495,0.000007845537,0.000002182853,0.00001087438,0.0000192064,0.00001050783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999024,0.00002209785,0.00003617457,0.00001373354,0.00001816777,0.000007503787],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110558,0.00002713453,0.002068972,0.00006840251,0.00003229122,0.0006025676,0.000142609,0.9197791,0.04992027,0.01501774,0.0002390255,0.01199137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001411224,0.00009400288,0.001642328,0.000006983207,0.00001047899,0.0001622335,0.00006434959,0.9944824,0.001532342,0.001232563,0.0007392772,0.00001892127],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7594923,0.0004117618,0.2204817,0.0001563832,0.00002824813,0.00005986704,0.0001591849,0.000215369,0.01899516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929367,0.0001034385,0.004040942,0.000007827565,0.000003485506,0.00002044153,0.00002528403,0.000006395,0.002855433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002731419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009137511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01041158898845929,"score_gpt":0.1964556310208638,"score_spread":0.1860440420324045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}