{"id":"W2566146118","doi":"10.1523/eneuro.0145-16.2016","title":"Language in Context: MEG Evidence for Modality-General and -Specific Responses to Reference Resolution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eNeuro","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Abu Dhabi; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Magnetoencephalography; Modality (human–computer interaction); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Comprehension; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Neuroscience; Communication; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Electroencephalography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002187074,0.0001871939,0.000231412,0.0002276438,0.0001226339,0.0004042989,0.0002821984,0.0005623943,0.001527145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001715073,0.0001804891,0.0002272277,0.0002302269,0.0003343825,0.0005598406,0.0004993118,0.000429772,0.0002420029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001573716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009534061,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000303787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005941059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998853,0.00001688874,0.00000711338,0.00004672506,0.00002165393,0.00002223051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999696,0.0001394915,0.00005481424,0.00003840031,0.00004507697,0.00002621809],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003340718,0.00001622069,0.002142245,0.00009457174,0.00002116954,0.0003588438,0.0002966104,0.00007122017,0.9858209,0.0004314752,0.0001548717,0.01025781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002662688,0.0007770959,0.6173105,0.0001054999,0.000226445,0.00590744,0.001230179,0.004103286,0.3531759,0.01010654,0.006701193,0.00008965313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9799284,0.001171718,0.01189673,0.0003011683,0.00005473161,0.00003038839,0.0003656359,0.000155731,0.006095397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957786,0.0002434081,0.003000654,0.0001709612,0.00003490753,0.00003063669,0.0001520261,0.00003084983,0.0005578924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001527145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005108774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1321252073734594,"score_gpt":0.3661715417405733,"score_spread":0.2340463343671139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}