{"id":"W2566153123","doi":"10.1080/10888438.2016.1263993","title":"Differential Effects of Context and Feedback on Orthographic Learning: How Good Is Good Enough?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Studies of Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Spelling; Reading (process); Context (archaeology); Computer science; Isolation (microbiology); Orthographic projection; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004066376,0.0002225509,0.0005089065,0.0003722075,0.0002836108,0.00005108766,0.0001853224,0.00007811877,0.00007705433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000334615,0.0001446809,0.0001216884,0.000369713,0.000721322,0.00008262406,0.0001230738,0.0001192894,0.00003276272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002584102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001552606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001354063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004387216,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981807,0.000148531,0.0003296951,0.0006090957,0.0003474715,0.0003844611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980918,0.0009652315,0.0003165844,0.0003567403,0.0001881271,0.00008151189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002878134,0.0005046717,0.3901825,0.0009051966,0.002365467,0.00002684969,0.07947159,3.929475e-7,0.1041765,0.01745509,0.02097067,0.3836533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0109747,0.003209528,0.566412,0.008766812,0.0005657017,0.00003849155,0.02783914,0.00001243718,0.231559,0.001079891,0.1478792,0.001663113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917101,0.001780084,0.00005691317,0.0005411741,0.002905879,0.0002455728,0.00001189916,0.00003755199,0.002710867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691388,0.0001541147,0.00007775399,0.00001880252,0.00004834871,0.00002418489,0.000002371724,0.00001792304,0.03051771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3819902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5899915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02328394159978539,"score_gpt":0.2953020606060704,"score_spread":0.272018119006285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}