{"id":"W2566207575","doi":"10.5558/tfc2016-081","title":"The Delphi method as an alternative to standard committee meetings to identify ecological issues for forest ecosystem-based management: A case study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Delphi Technique in Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Natural Resources Canada; Université Laval","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies","keywords":"Delphi method; Delphi; Scope (computer science); Environmental resource management; Medical education; Psychology; Public relations; Business; Political science; Medicine; Computer science; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06063664,0.0007546052,0.0005163535,0.002836862,0.006077583,0.003205575,0.00182894,0.002994948,0.00363026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03651693,0.0005902363,0.0008986318,0.002833566,0.00300486,0.004032562,0.004424906,0.002579544,0.0004968994],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003343268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004814178,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004187001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009588087,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9034057,0.08908831,0.001323693,0.0009110361,0.00348091,0.001790328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9529321,0.03962332,0.001295418,0.00149575,0.003108161,0.001545344],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001411328,0.007384244,0.01746989,0.005358914,0.0001315259,0.01691289,0.4529462,0.006182555,0.009077446,0.05557825,0.01468838,0.4128585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000767566,0.01151854,0.02485338,0.006754894,0.0001708801,0.01327671,0.6243486,0.02468111,0.0127506,0.01999994,0.2602934,0.0005843078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7888014,0.002990307,0.1249078,0.007249097,0.0005660052,0.01588234,0.0002345592,0.00012183,0.05924667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8296982,0.002367009,0.1522702,0.001239254,0.0001102886,0.008457402,0.00009318916,0.00006432521,0.005700134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06063664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.320681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1025262798439966,"score_gpt":0.5037092073229468,"score_spread":0.4011829274789502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}