{"id":"W2566481544","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9861-3","title":"The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Slippery slope; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of science; Defeasible estate; Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Value (mathematics); Argumentation framework; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01087913,0.0000840088,0.00009089197,0.00007778998,0.0007947267,0.0001787578,0.0005461002,0.000230158,0.00000210923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008107865,0.00004322876,0.00002735162,0.0004587968,0.001077195,0.0001401181,0.00005211979,0.0009394269,0.000002194062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000805909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004303986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003211699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004400333,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981562,0.00009323005,0.0001664054,0.0001593784,0.001018137,0.0004066647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968844,0.002606979,0.00003378939,0.0001847278,0.0001998073,0.00009029303],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004515558,0.00001946623,0.0003013587,0.00002813974,0.000006443876,0.000004834097,0.0655739,0.001526256,0.008649843,0.9182774,0.00009143748,0.005516448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002352396,0.001441986,0.3783831,0.003627698,0.00008378742,0.0000155422,0.04412191,0.01200447,0.009210818,0.1273688,0.4186142,0.00277527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8261869,0.0002964119,0.0009532864,0.1672396,0.0008234253,0.0002865144,0.000003120514,0.00005530987,0.004155422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975442,0.00125498,0.0001824454,0.0008650096,0.00009576444,0.000007372206,4.478149e-8,0.000005929501,0.00004430654],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7909086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9706457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04229210686061018,"score_gpt":0.3378338198720225,"score_spread":0.2955417130114123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}