{"id":"W2566481544","doi":"10.1007/s11948-016-9861-3","title":"The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Slippery slope; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy of science; Defeasible estate; Epistemology; Defeasible reasoning; Value (mathematics); Argumentation framework; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02656848,0.0006359579,0.00102242,0.001690742,0.007119278,0.009021809,0.00216254,0.02564575,0.006191874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06254102,0.0005506124,0.0007406563,0.001639591,0.05257773,0.01335659,0.005654691,0.0204886,0.001473063],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004123036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004951462,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002884914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002351451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9802989,0.01142497,0.0004221481,0.001872274,0.004888454,0.00109339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662421,0.02687644,0.001504162,0.001860617,0.002398121,0.001118435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001571013,0.000005696419,0.0001005322,0.0000130235,0.000005883928,0.00004123423,0.0007375628,0.0001855464,0.00005406736,0.993363,0.003881727,0.001596087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001210392,0.000005004897,0.00008451904,0.00004626552,0.000003142813,0.00002094063,0.0002997415,0.0002215046,0.00007636731,0.9875919,0.01163263,0.000005672179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02825497,0.003965118,0.03061748,0.7011406,0.002175857,0.00003472509,0.00007818297,0.00004058091,0.2336924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8648089,0.002250821,0.008879184,0.1016563,0.002894943,0.0001496364,0.00003194618,0.0001363177,0.01919188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02656848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1405092,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04229210686061018,"score_gpt":0.3378338198720225,"score_spread":0.2955417130114123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}