{"id":"W2566483221","doi":"10.1177/0969733016684545","title":"Remaining in the nursing profession: The relevance of strong evaluations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing Ethics","topic":"Nursing education and management","field":"Nursing","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Norwegian; Qualitative research; Casual; Context (archaeology); Nursing; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Empirical research; Interpretation (philosophy); Medicine; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05349264,0.0004982383,0.0006267506,0.003176518,0.006989424,0.01373413,0.001606569,0.002555762,0.003168418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1335396,0.0003968399,0.0006410317,0.001835417,0.04259953,0.01187294,0.009694778,0.004154122,0.0003641866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009156889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01448302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006081458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006651738,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9110982,0.07053137,0.002278743,0.002241459,0.009686821,0.004163347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79001,0.1523275,0.01595509,0.007963253,0.02270693,0.01103712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002697628,0.0001609863,0.03276073,0.001398933,0.00008496108,0.001835942,0.333207,0.000491453,0.0004794118,0.5101632,0.01167487,0.1074727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005835574,0.0003859978,0.03843153,0.005309611,0.00008989617,0.001467347,0.4702492,0.001113032,0.0009021225,0.379973,0.1017954,0.0002245069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3412437,0.02091945,0.02913781,0.1333767,0.002310229,0.0003772358,0.0001138866,0.0000970441,0.4724238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941935,0.001341304,0.001417164,0.001448215,0.0001218325,0.00006225907,0.00001416849,0.00002012871,0.001381393],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05349264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2828995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1935969639009014,"score_gpt":0.4904816725065414,"score_spread":0.29688470860564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}