{"id":"W2566526665","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11310","title":"A new method for robust mixture regression","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institutes of Health; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Outlier; Robust regression; Computation; Mixture model; Expectation–maximization algorithm; Contrast (vision); Regression analysis; Regression; Computer science; Robust statistics; Mathematics; Algorithm; Maximum likelihood; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003180366,0.001580199,0.001922519,0.002298106,0.0007880725,0.001519979,0.003577706,0.00227939,0.005924534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01032849,0.0009810013,0.002907534,0.002349851,0.001178312,0.002367863,0.00307108,0.00333201,0.003947212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007689657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001677812,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003003892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00222603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971147,0.001012762,0.0001445531,0.0006403599,0.0009575385,0.0001300639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974467,0.001178402,0.0002730566,0.0004301958,0.0005772247,0.00009444083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001837094,0.0001010466,0.001037218,0.000478716,0.0003771558,0.0002811785,0.0001795192,0.276391,0.02087973,0.1800844,0.01315292,0.5068533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001953389,0.00003634358,0.0002327317,0.00003445847,0.00005294812,0.000263625,0.0000134306,0.9470981,0.003910119,0.02715939,0.02111967,0.00005968728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001616438,0.00008787096,0.9992293,0.0000253241,0.00002909714,0.00001028512,0.00002227429,0.0001777185,0.0002564631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01761727,0.0003775141,0.9776383,0.0001285536,0.0001537445,0.00016131,0.0002997387,0.0004998049,0.003123739],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005924534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0198195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02981252699360441,"score_gpt":0.2932130286168522,"score_spread":0.2634005016232478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}