{"id":"W2566526665","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11310","title":"A new method for robust mixture regression","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institutes of Health; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Outlier; Robust regression; Computation; Mixture model; Expectation–maximization algorithm; Contrast (vision); Regression analysis; Regression; Computer science; Robust statistics; Mathematics; Algorithm; Maximum likelihood; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006071923,0.0001099737,0.0002092214,0.0001729077,0.00009484975,0.00008664739,0.0005621748,0.00007797457,0.0000456147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004575056,0.00006561734,0.00006767791,0.0001235029,0.00002254079,0.0002077675,0.00001419201,0.0001108255,0.000002764168],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009154357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001983439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000314878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001977697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990565,0.00009230732,0.0002874369,0.0001404494,0.0001350395,0.0002883165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979113,0.0004200211,0.0002355894,0.0002230907,0.000320083,0.0008899246],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004156048,0.000001466354,0.00001643776,0.000005738504,0.00001091097,0.00006505055,0.0001447223,0.000004455109,0.0001886499,0.1953488,0.1800003,0.6242093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00129397,0.0003559281,0.0003000952,0.0003422001,0.00004872827,0.0005330923,0.0000102386,0.007957017,0.001212703,0.767284,0.2203508,0.0003112798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003330447,0.0003386917,0.9941996,0.004239129,0.0008363949,0.00007309846,0.000106074,0.000005225316,0.0001984381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003378277,0.00002109425,0.9972911,0.0004283347,0.0002898855,8.191602e-7,6.135083e-7,0.00001168273,0.001618635],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.623898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3518535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02981252699360441,"score_gpt":0.2932130286168522,"score_spread":0.2634005016232478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}