{"id":"W2566753052","doi":"10.1111/ecog.02539","title":"Do metacommunity mass effects predict changes in species incidence and abundance?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecography","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Metacommunity; Abundance (ecology); Relative abundance distribution; Ecology; Relative species abundance; Null model; Ecological succession; Macroecology; Context (archaeology); Fragmentation (computing); Extinction (optical mineralogy); Rare species; Population; Species richness; Biology; Geography; Biological dispersal; Habitat; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002776206,0.00008788894,0.0001207639,0.00007884981,0.0001310443,0.00001040655,0.000126891,0.00004329262,0.0002139153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006449402,0.00006084273,0.00002527186,0.0002198538,0.0004337,0.0001495368,0.0001420512,0.00007583491,0.00004602062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002457372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001480362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003670661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006505064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993985,0.00009565773,0.00008467589,0.0001675811,0.00008179703,0.0001717328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994446,0.0003312599,0.00004208558,0.0001415479,0.000003804153,0.00003667676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005509828,0.00001957171,0.9946033,0.000008431954,0.00001244691,0.00000357782,0.0003656343,0.000003993673,0.002249687,0.0002696943,0.0001389026,0.002319244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002392714,0.00006811308,0.9907958,0.0000269073,0.000007138725,0.000001164734,0.00005633428,0.00002699588,0.0004952358,0.007574538,0.000622617,0.00008591436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932125,0.0003420114,0.0002350058,0.0007217276,0.0001001426,0.0001276646,0.000004322074,0.00002475705,0.005231897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979616,0.001027387,0.0005988207,0.0001347638,0.0000110159,0.00004028573,5.350294e-7,0.000004103291,0.0002215318],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007304844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3629978,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007016323833718696,"score_gpt":0.213021937095438,"score_spread":0.2060056132617193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}