{"id":"W2567165128","doi":"10.1111/jvs.12499","title":"Differential responses of native and exotic plant species to an invasive grass are driven by variation in biotic and abiotic factors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vegetation Science","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bromus inermis; Introduced species; Species richness; Abiotic component; Biology; Ecology; Invasive species; Plant community; Community structure; Forage","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004074859,0.0000743857,0.0001574093,0.0002224857,0.0001121573,0.00002296018,0.0001274555,0.00002870737,0.00001571284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008678907,0.00004823387,0.00001375955,0.0002790838,0.000603263,0.0006710186,0.00006416424,0.00005285212,0.000001486794],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003275553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001026997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006332966,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990525,0.000095418,0.0002825971,0.0001600498,0.0002917126,0.0001177623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989845,0.0004561698,0.0003560239,0.00005255271,0.00006545297,0.00008530774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003569002,0.00004392253,0.674187,0.000006270718,0.000005135761,0.000002618321,0.004837506,0.000161302,0.3204136,0.0001792959,0.000004476339,0.0001231015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003073667,0.0002810299,0.9893508,0.00006678994,0.000009351525,0.000009718899,0.0005972611,0.0004844213,0.008017034,0.0008128171,0.00000121566,0.00006219102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976704,0.00001696174,0.00163707,0.0004540937,0.00009676549,0.00008761341,0.000007674274,0.000001929938,0.0000275656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994847,0.00006233041,0.000385001,0.00003215959,0.000006117454,7.624259e-7,2.466735e-7,0.000002284327,0.00002646487],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3151638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2222748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02278997361115731,"score_gpt":0.2522812837706944,"score_spread":0.2294913101595371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}