{"id":"W2567165128","doi":"10.1111/jvs.12499","title":"Differential responses of native and exotic plant species to an invasive grass are driven by variation in biotic and abiotic factors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vegetation Science","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bromus inermis; Introduced species; Species richness; Abiotic component; Biology; Ecology; Invasive species; Plant community; Community structure; Forage","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003880639,0.0002178059,0.0002961406,0.0004094564,0.0003668773,0.000626863,0.0002903593,0.0002565039,0.001023724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007829279,0.0001796401,0.0002483191,0.0002422559,0.0004898298,0.0002347199,0.0005263175,0.0003527552,0.0001244928],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007429796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004142156,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02205657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07042824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996743,0.00005510299,0.000009904459,0.00009853326,0.0000768746,0.00008526578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991795,0.0001408608,0.000201334,0.00005452707,0.0001475886,0.0002762158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000758392,0.0001578868,0.555667,0.00006753639,0.0002592925,0.0001435311,0.0008953669,0.00055316,0.4362537,0.0001115365,0.0001553778,0.004977089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001656903,0.00003827226,0.9988303,0.000001163652,0.000006772084,0.00001944863,0.0002103905,0.0003255069,0.0004890374,0.00001648542,0.00005796109,0.000003004796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997211,0.00002169008,0.00005123151,0.000003631977,9.663962e-7,0.000002270153,0.00003012791,0.000002787435,0.0001661417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994765,0.0000198205,0.0001239465,0.0000195312,0.000001005728,0.000005345229,0.0001242253,0.000003984522,0.000225715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02205657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04385638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02278997361115731,"score_gpt":0.2522812837706944,"score_spread":0.2294913101595371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}